Recent Posts

Long Lead Items for a Process Piping Industry

After confirmation of funding gates during FEED; major oil & gas firms prepare the novation stage for Long Lead Items (LLI) with the purpose to deliver early beneficial engineering for the selected facilities inherent to every piece of equipment. The identification of LLIs is followed by inquiry requisitions to bidders and then evaluated technically prior to POs and consequent awards to vendors. This article explores the design for pre-fabrication of yard-mounted elements per LLI, a practice considered cost-effective and low risk vs stick-built mounted facilities. The piping engineering task force is a major player in delivering AFD work packages for the Novation of LLIs prior to EPC awards.

What is a Long Lead Item?

Long lead item refers to the equipment, product, or system that is identified at the earliest stage of a project to have a delivery time long enough to affect directly the overall lead time of the project during the EPC phase.

To reduce the schedule impact, procurement activation is pursued as early as necessary. In order to achieve Start-up schedule milestones, some LLIs are procured at an early project time, typically at the back end of the FEED stage.

Due to economics and risk, certain activities in LLIs are envisaged and agreed upon earlier to EPC and designed during a bridging period of beneficial engineering applied to LLIs in order to satisfy demands that emerged from Purchase Orders between the stakeholders. This activity is called “Novation of LLIs”, involving the Oil-Gas producer (Client), FEED Contractor (Buyer), LLI Vendor (Supplier), and EPC contractor (LSTK).

Type of Long Lead Items – Hydrocarbon Processing Industry

Long lead items are determined by Procurement in combination with Engineering and Process management. Delivery times are predominantly the function of manufacturing time (constrained by material, energy, and demand). Below is an LLI list with potential candidates, during the Pre FEED evaluation of a Hydrocracking Unit.

Typical LLI List
Fig. 1: Typical LLI List

Once the Long lead item lists candidates are approved by Procurement during FEED, Pre ORDER RFQ status is set up to PO Placement for LLI AWARD. Planners adjust a temporary schedule with agreed milestones, normally orbital to TBE, where comments and bidder queries are addressed.

Once LLI is awarded the NOVATION starts. COLUMNS are the most valuable LLI due to CLIPS. For other LLIs, only a PLOT-PLAN dimensional and Stress verification is sufficient to NOVATE. 

Delayering LLI Deliverables for a VERTICAL COLUMN

Fig. 2: Delayering of Vertical Column

Step 01 – Accessibility: Conventions are agreed upon for access miscellaneous. PIP standards used to be acceptable in absence of well-defined parameters 

Step 02 –Internals / Nozzle Orientation: Passes for trays are taken preliminarily from MDS to generate a first design for all Man-holes, Thermowells, and distributors (for accessing/removing internals avoiding downcomers) encompassed with Plot-Plans and 3D Models (if available). Vendor GA to replace MDS (when issued)

Step 03 – Ergonomics: Access to valves, instruments, and each nozzle is agreed upon with Operations.

Step 04 – Large Loads relocation: Large valves, blinds, or any other elements that can be relocated to structures to alleviate clips are discussed and agreed upon.

Step 05 – Level Instruments: Level instruments have a large bearing on the definition of platforming, internals, and nozzle orientation.

Step 06 – Platforming allowable: Maximum spans are agreed upon or waived where necessary.

Step 07 – Nozzle projection: Nozzle projection in excess or defect to calculation per ASME is agreed with the Oil Company engineering rep and Mechanical Engineering.

Step 08 – Utility Risers: Utility Stations and Steam Out, required in columns in centralized headers rising from a dedicated angular area, diverting to each consumption point.

Step 09 – Miscellaneous: Davits, Internal ladders, Skirt Opening & vents, Name Plate, Stiffening Rings, Plate Welding, Earthing and Tailing Lugs, etc., are oriented by Piping (mainly as comments to the Vendor’s GA).

Step 10 – Transportation & Lifting: Lifting Trunnion and Tailing Lugs are oriented by the Construction Engineer. Crane’s standing position is determined by Lifting Studies first.

Step 11 – Pre-Dressing & Erection: Columns can be fully pre-dressed, Partially dressed, or completely undressed prior to Erection.

Step 12 – Fireproofing & Fire protection: Fireproofed surfaces are to be defined as well as pre-action sprinkler rings and dry risers.

Step 13 – Insulation: Insulation has bearing in nozzle projections. Rings and clips to support insulation are fully defined by the LLI vendor.

Step 14 – Tolerances & Welding: Welding procedures and fabrication tolerances are reviewed and commented on by the Piping Material engineer to be in compliance with Client standards and International codes.

Step 15 – Hookups & assemblies: Vents, drains and Instrument hook-ups are not defined at this stage of the project (nor necessary in most cases). Where required, agreement w/Client is to take place.

Step 16 – Piping Classes: In general only Class index, Technical Requirements, and Valve selection guides are only available. Dummy, corporate, PIP, client, or temporary Piping Classes might be needed, for 3D Modelling and to justify certain specific designs or arrangements (particularly branch tables, due to s.i.f  affecting stress calculations, might be temporarily determined)

Step 17 – Wall thickness calculation: Usually full flange rating thickness is initially considered for estimation and quantification and re-used by Stress Engineers to Novate. However, where Line List is complete, a second pass using these values might be needed if too conservative for evaluating certain stresses, particularly due to inference in vertical loads.

Step 18 – Nozzle Loads – Piping Stresses: Nozzle loads are the net forces and moments exerted on equipment nozzles, that need to be within allowable limits pre/determined. Pipe stress analysis (thermal flexibility analysis) predicts both stresses in piping and loads on nozzles resulting from thermal gradients/transients, weights, pressure (sustained), and bolt-up strain.

Step 19 – Platform Loads: Nodes from stresses outputs; directly restrained statically or elastically from structural platforms, are to be passed to the Civil Group, including a graphic showing the application point, for Platforming Design and Engineering considerations (for Novation in particular, sizing the Platform Clips).

Step 20 – Standard & Special Piping Supports Nodes from stresses outputs; directly restrained statically or elastically from the Equipment skin, are to be passed to the Civil Group (for beam sizing) and the Mechanical Group, including graphic showing geometries, application point, and Loads, for Vendor’s Engineering considerations (for Novation in particular, sizing the SPS Clips)

LLIs – Novation – Design Review Report & EPC Handover: Finally a 3D Model Review is discussed and agreed upon final changes, and reports are delivered. The Buyer then Handover the Long Lead Item Supply to the awarded LTSK Contractor.

About the Author:  The above article has been prepared by Dr. Javier Blasco Alberto, Associate Professor,  School of Engineering and Architecture, University of Zaragoza. He also collaborates actively with InIPED. This is reproduced with his permission in this blog as I feel it will be helpful for readers. To know more about the Author Please click here

Selection of Pipe Flanges in Piping Industry

This article will provide a guideline for the selection of metallic pipe flanges and provides information on pressure-temperature ratings, dimensions, tolerances, materials, marking, and testing of piping flanges and flanged fittings in sizes NPS 1/2 to 48, and classes 150 to 2500 which can be used in conjunction with ASME B16.5, B16.47, B31.3, B31.4, and B31.8.

Pressure Temperature Rating of Pipe Flanges

The Pressure-Temperature ratings for the applicable materials listed in ASME B16.5, Table 1A shall be the maximum allowable working gage pressures at temperatures shown in Table 2 of the same standard. The basis for establishing ratings shall be the minimum wall thickness, which shall be in accordance with ASME B16.5, Annexure D. The material groupings are based on closely matched allowable and yield strength values.

Within each pressure class, the dimensions are held constant, irrespective of the material. Physical properties, and thereby the allowable stress values, of different materials, vary, so the pressure-temperature ratings within each pressure class vary with the material. For example, a class 600 forged carbon steel (ASTM A105) pipe flange is rated at 1270 PSIG at 400 °F, whereas a class 600 forged stainless steel (A182-F304) flange is rated at 995 PSIG at 400 °F.

Piping Flange Dimensional Standards

The following dimensional standards shall apply to metallic pipe flanges and bolthole patterns of non-metallic companion flanges:

  • ASME B16.1, for integral cast iron piping flanges and blind flanges
  • ASME B16.5, Classes 150, 300, 600, 900, and 1500 up to NPS 24, and class 2500 up to NPS 12. Class 400 carbon steel flanges shall not be used.
  • Pipe Flanges larger than NPS 24 shall be specified in accordance with ASME B16.47. ASME B16.47 Series A for NPS 26 to NPS 60 in class 150 to 900 replaces these flange sizes in MSS SP-44. This is usually used in plants for mating certain valves.
  • Series B supersedes API 605 in sizes NPS 26 to 60. Series B is used for pipelines and is restricted to pipe flanges used for joints.
  • MSS SP-44 shall be used for steel pipeline flanges for sizes smaller than ASME B16.47 where the material grade is not listed in ASME B16.5
  • Piping Flanges of unlisted materials and flanges not covered by the above standards shall be designed in accordance with ASME Section VIII Div 1, Appendix 2, and for blind flanges, in accordance with ASME Section VIII Div 1, Section UG-34
  • Tolerances for pipe flanges shall be in accordance with ASME B16.5, section 7 for flanges up to NPS 24, and ASME B16.47 for flanges over NPS 24.

Pipe Flange Facings

Dimensions for flange facings shall be in accordance with ASME B16.5, Table 4 for flat face, raised face, and tongue and groove flanges, and Table 5 for ring joint flanges. These tables shall be used in conjunction with ASME B16.5, Figure 7.

Guidelines for Selection of Various Types of Flanges

Flat-face flanges, with full-face gaskets, shall be used when one or both of the mating pipe flanges in a joint are ASME B16.1. Class 125 gray cast iron, aluminum, or plastic, can be over-stressed by bearing against a raised face. Adapter rings may be necessary in some cases, to level off the surface, for mating equipment.

Raised face flanges shall be specified in ratings up to Class 600. These piping flanges are supplied with a 0.06-inch raised face, which is included in the minimum flange thickness. The finished height of the face shall be less than the nominal pipe wall thickness. Flanges in classes over 600 are supplied with a 0.25-inch raised face that is additional to the minimum flange thickness.

In ring-joint flanges, the thickness of the lap remaining after machining the ring groove shall not be less than the nominal wall thickness of the pipe used. Ring joint flanges for use with ASME B16.20 ring joint gaskets shall be used for:

  • Piping Flanges in Class 900 and higher ratings
  • Design temperatures in excess of 480 °C
  • API 6A Type 6B flanges (wellhead piping)
  • Hazardous fluid mediums

Tongue-and-groove facing, and male-and-female facing joints, shall not be used except in high-pressure service, or when it is necessary to match existing equipment.

Piping Flanges shall be finished in accordance with MSS SP-6, and ASME B46.1. Table I provides acceptable ranges of contact surface finishes for each type of gasket and service. The surface finishes shall be in Ra, Roughness average, expressed in micrometers, followed by micro-inches.

Pipe Flange roughness shall be judged by visual comparison to Ra standards using the GAR model S-22 Micro Finish Comparator.

Ring joint flanges shall have flat-bottom type grooves in accordance with ASME B16.20.

The bore of Welding Neck Flanges and Hub Design

Dimensions of welding end, bevel slopes, and bores shall be in accordance with ASME B16.5, Table 6, and Figures 8 to 14. Ratings of welding neck flanges shall be based upon their hubs at the welding end having thicknesses equal to that calculated for pipe having a 40 ksi specified minimum yield strength (SMYS). When the SMYS of the hub is less than that of the attached pipe, the minimum thickness of the hub at the welding end shall be at least equal to the product of the pipe wall thickness and the ratio, pipe to flange, of the specified minimum yield strengths. See MSS SP-44.

Mis-matches between pipe and flange shall be corrected during fabrication. Weldneck shall be tapered bored if specified in the purchase description. Pipe wall thickness shall be specified in the purchase description to ensure that the flange is bored within the specified tolerance.

Piping Flange Material Limitations

  • Flanges and flanged fittings shall be castings, forgings, or plates.
  • Bolting materials shall conform to ASME B16.5, Table 1B.
  • The material for flanges in pipeline service shall be suitable for welding. The carbon equivalents shall match the pipe material.

Iron Flanges

Cast Iron Flanges: Gray cast iron flanges shall not be used for process piping within the battery limits of any plant. The only exception shall be for use in approved fire systems. The material shall be ASTM A 126, Class B.

Ductile Iron Flanges: Ductile iron flanges may be used, in proprietary systems, for example, plastic-lined steel piping, as backup flanges for lapped joints.

ASME B16.1 Class 125 and Class 250 cast iron flanges may be mated with ASME B16.5 Class 150 and 300 steel flanges respectively. However, care shall be exercised to ensure that a flat-faced cast iron flange shall mate only with a flat-faced steel flange, and vice versa.

Carbon Steel Pipe Flanges

  • Carbon steel flanges shall not be used in services over 425 °C.
  • General Service- The standard carbon steel material shall be ASTM A105. Standard material shall be used between minus 29 °C and 425 °C.
  • Low-temperature Alloy Steel Flanges. Carbon steel flanges used for services below minus 29 °C, shall conform to the impact-testing requirements of ASME B31.3, ASTM A 350-LF2 shall be the standard material for this service.

Low and Intermediate Alloy Steel Piping Flanges

  • Material for Low alloy steel flanges (11/4 Cr – 1/2 Mo) shall be ASTM A 182-F11. Material for intermediate alloy steel flanges (11/2 Cr – 5 Mo) shall be ASTM A 182-F5.

Stainless Steel and Non-ferrous Pipe Flanges

Usually, weld neck flanges shall match the metallurgy of the pipe in any material class. Austenitic stainless steels, however, may in certain cases be interchangeable. For example, type 347 and 321 stainless steels are compatible. Flanges that are double stamped, or double graded, and are so marked. For example, low carbon grades such as 304L, and 316L may be substituted, for the ‘straight’ grade, provided that the ‘L’ grade meets the physical requirements of the application.

When pipe material is forged, weld neck flanges shall be forged. When pipe material is not forged, material for weld neck flanges shall be subject to client approval.

 Pipeline Service Flanges

  • Flanges for pipeline service shall match SMYS, and carbon equivalency specified in ASME B31.4 and B31.8.

NACE Service Flanges

When an in-plant service has water and H2S concentrations above the limits specified in NACE MR0175, that service shall be considered as the NACE service. Flanges for use in the NACE service shall be in accordance with NACE MR0175 special requirements. The purchase description shall specify the ‘NACE service’.

High-Strength Material Flanges for Pipeline Service

Flange Types

The selection of appropriate joining methods varies with the required mechanical strength in the joint, from a minimum, as in slip-on connections, to a maximum, as in integral-type flanges that are cast, integrally forged, or butt-welded to the pipe.

Weldneck Flanges

  • ASME B16.5 weld neck flanges with tapered hub and welding end shall be the primary selection for flanged joints in metallic piping systems of NPS 2 and larger. The individual material classes show the size range for any given service.
  • Welding ends of weld neck flanges shall be in accordance with ASME B16.5, Figures 8 to 14.

Threaded Flanges

  • When future material classes are generated, threaded flanges shall be added to material classes for threaded service, generally for mating equipment, and transitions between threaded and flanged piping.
  • Threaded flanges may also be used for water and air service in pipe sizes NPS 6 and less and at a design temperature of 250 °F and below. Seal welding shall not be required.
  • Threaded flanges shall be limited to size NPS 2 and smaller in hazardous service.
  • Threaded flanges shall have taper-type threads and shall conform to ASME B1.20.1.

Socket weld Flanges

Socket weld flanges and socket weld-reducing flanges are added to material classes for mating equipment, where a union will be subject to external stresses; and transitions between socket weld and flanged piping.

Slip-on Flanges

Slip-on flanges cost less than welding neck flanges and require less accurate pipe cutting, but their strength is approximately 2/3 of weld neck flanges under internal pressure, and they have approximately 1/3 the fatigue life of weld neck flanges.

Slip-on flanges shall be welded at the front and back of the hub, but not on the sealing face.

Slip-on flanges and reducing slip-on flanges shall not be used in the following services:

  • Severe cyclic conditions. See ASME B31.3, paragraph 300.2.
  • Design temperatures above 230 °C, or where the corrosion allowance exceeds 3 mm
  • ASME B16.5 Class 400 or higher rating
  • Piping Flange sizes larger than NPS 24 unless stress calculations in accordance with ASME Section VIII Div 1, Appendix 2, with thermal and other external piping loads considered, show that the slip-on flanged joint will not be over-stressed.
  • In hydrogen service with a hydrogen partial pressure above 690 kPa, flanges shall have a predrilled 3 mm diameter hole to vent the space between the pipe OD and the flange bore.

Lapped Joint Flanges

A lap joint is made up of a pair of stub ends, a pair of lap joint flanges used as a backup, and bolts and gaskets. These allow easy alignment of bolt holes and flanged joints.

The stub end shall match the material of the pipe. Stub ends for lapped joint flanges, if fabricated by welding, shall be made with full penetration welds.

Advantages are that lapped joints are an economical alternative to weld necks, and cost savings are large when the material is very expensive; dissimilar materials can be joined, provided galvanic corrosion does not occur; and spools can be rotated.

The disadvantage of this joint is that it is sensitive to external stress. Lapped joint flanges shall not be used in severe cyclic conditions.

 Blind Flanges

  • Blind flanges shall be used as end closures on flanged ends and valves unless end caps are specified in the design.
  • Blind flanges are forgings and shall be manufactured to the same materials standards as other matching flanges.
  • Blind flanges shall be of the same material as the weld necks, in all services. In corrosive atmospheres, stainless steel shall be used.
  • Blind flanges shall not be drilled for connections, for example, drains and flushing, unless stress calculations in accordance with ASME Section VIII Div 1, Appendix 2 show that the flanges will not be overstressed.

Orifice Flanges

  • Orifice flanges shall conform to this standard and ASME B16.36.
  • Orifice flanges shall be weld neck flanges.
  • Orifice flanges shall have jackscrews to facilitate the disassembly of the flanged joint during maintenance.

Other Standards

Other standards, for example, AWWA C207 for hub flanges, may be required for proper mating to equipment and shall be reviewed at the time of generation of a material class.

Information Required for Purchasing a Flange

The following shall be included in the purchase description for flanges:

  • Type of flange
  • Flange Rating
  • Flange Dimensional standard
  • Flange facing
  • Contact surface finish
  • Tolerances
  • Material grade
  • Additional material and testing requirements, if applicable
  • Nominal size of the flange
  • Wall thickness as defined by schedule, weight, or actual decimal wall

Marking of Flanges and Flanged Fittings

Flanges and flanged fittings shall be marked in accordance with MSS SP-25. The following shall be included in the marking:

  • Pressure rating class
  • ASME B16 designation
  • Nominal pipe size
  • The letter ‘R’ and the corresponding ring groove number for ring joint flanges
  • The letters ‘PL’ shall precede the grade symbol followed by the material grade of the pipe
  • Type of flange facing
  • Schedule or wall thickness for weld-neck flanges

Some more ready references for you:

Flange Selection Guidelines
Pressure Equivalent Method in Caesar II
Flange leakage calculation ASME Section VIII in Caesar II
Flange leakage calculation NC 3658.3 method in Caesar II
Procedure for Flange Bolt Tightening of Various Sizes of Flanges

Importance of Inter Discipline Check or IDC

What is IDC or Inter Discipline Check?

IDC or “Inter Discipline Check” is related to the quality of engineering deliverables. This term is frequently used in the engineering design and consulting field. The main objective is to provide error-free Engineering deliverables to the construction team that paves way for a smooth Construction, Operation, and Maintenance of the Plant or Processing Facility. This is a very good tool for improving the quality of engineering deliverables with minimum error.

This article specifically explains the Definition, Description, and Importance of IDC.

Engineering Disciplines involved in the Design firm

Normally, a multi-disciplinary team is engaged in providing consultancy and design services in the chemical process industry in an engineering design and consulting firm. The engineering teams that normally constitute the engineering design and consulting firm are

Importance of IDC Process

During the execution of any project, All the above-mentioned engineering teams prepare several engineering documents and deliverables. However, with very few exceptions, most of the projects are multi-disciplinary in nature. It means, to complete engineering activity drawings, documents, and calculations are required from all disciplines. To brief, the complete engineering package of any project comprises items from all disciplines.

In a multi-disciplinary project environment, drawings, documents, and deliverables for all disciplines become a joint or coordinated effort of all disciplines. Also, the process engineering group is the starting point of any project. As many interrelated disciplines are involved in creating engineering deliverables, the chances of missing an item or generating an error are high. The Interdisciplinary check process, therefore, is an activity to ensure the following:

  1. Complete project awareness creation among the assigned multi-disciplinary team
  2. Ensuring that all critical documents/drawings/calculations are reviewed, marked, and corrected as required by the multi-disciplinary team for correct inputs, removal of errors, and ensuring that the project quality plan is followed for producing first-class project deliverables
  3. Assure that information is flowing periodically during the project execution phase. For example, vendor data, design review(s), HAZOP data, etc. are captured in the engineering deliverables which ensures that these deliverables are useful up to the level for the construction of the plant.

Documents requiring IDC

The author, being a process engineer, The IDC is explained in the context to process engineering. The process engineering documents/drawings that need an IDC from other disciplines are typically listed below:

  • Process Flow Diagrams (need IDC only from Instrumentation and QA)
  • Project Design Basis (Require IDC from Piping, Instrumentation, Mechanical, HSE, Electrical, Civil, Projects, QA)
  • Process & Instrument Diagrams (IDC from Piping, Mechanical, Instrumentation, Electrical, HSE, Projects, QA, Civil)
  • Process Datasheets of Equipment (Piping, Mechanical, Instrumentation, Electrical, QA)
  • Instrument Process Datasheets (Instrumentation, Piping, Electrical, QA)
  • Hazardous Area Classification Drawings (Electrical, Instrumentation, HSE, Mechanical, Piping. QA)
  • Operating, Control, and Safeguarding Philosophy (Instrumentation, Mechanical, Piping, QA)
  • Plant Operating Manual (Piping, Instrumentation, Mechanical, HSE, Electrical, QA)
  • Commissioning and Pre-Commissioning Procedures (Mechanical, Instrumentation, HSE, Piping, QA)
  • Design Review and Closeout Report (Instrumentation, Mechanical, HSE, Piping, Electrical, Projects, QA)
  • HAZOP Review and Closeout Report (Piping, HSE, Instrumentation, Projects, Mechanical, Electrical, QA)

The aforementioned deliverables are just a few examples of the important process/HSE deliverables that require an IDC. Similarly, there are many more deliverables and some of them could also be project-specific.

Some of the engineering deliverables from other disciplines that need IDC from the process are:

  1. Piping Material Requisitions or specifications
  2. Mechanical Material Requisitions or specifications
  3. Instrument Material Requisitions or specifications
  4. Pipe / Valve / special in-line fittings Vendor Data
  5. Electrical Load List prepared by the Electrical
  6. Equipment (Static / Rotating / Package) Vendor Data
  7. Instrument Vendor Data

IDC Matrix

Not all disciplines are required to review all deliverables. For example, A process engineer does not need to do an IDC for a transformer or sub-station specification, or an IDC for civil foundation drawings and structural piles. In a similar way, the process engineer need not review an electrical single-line diagram or instrument loop drawings. It doesn’t make sense for a process engineer to review cable schedules. So IDC is required from relevant disciplines only.

So there must be some analysis of what deliverable requires an IDC and from whom. That’s why good engineering companies prepare an IDC matrix that specifies the discipline-wise individual deliverable which requires an IDC and from whom.

Design Guidelines for PE & ROTO Lined Carbon Steel Piping

Carbon steel piping with internal PE / ROTO lining is used for liquid service with high chloride as well as higher oxygen content. The maximum operating temperature of the PE & ROTO lined piping is 60 °C. Also, these types of coatings are suitable for gas-liquid ratio values up to 300.

A PE liner consists of a number of Polyethylene pipe lengths, which are fused together and inserted into sections of carbon steel pipelines and flowlines. The Carbon Steel pipe provides pressure containment; while the PE liner provides corrosion protection. At the ends of the sections, the liners are terminated by PE stub ends. Connections between PE-lined carbon steel pipes shall be flanged.

The PE & ROTO lining is carried out only after the pipe spools are fabricated & hydro-tested. No welding is allowed on the pipe spool once the PE or ROTO lining is done. The pipe trunnion member & line stop members, if applicable, shall be welded prior to the lining. Hydrotesting of the spool or pipelines is done before the lining & after the lining also. Therefore, gaskets are required to be considered for each flanged joint for hydro test purposes.

The requirements to be considered while designing PE-lined piping are mentioned below:

PE/ROTO lining dimensional limitations: 

The longest continuous length of liner, which can be installed in straight pipe, depends on diameter and wall thickness but is generally reduced in practice by local curvature of the line.

For off-plot piping scope, the PE lining can be done for a pipe spool of up to 250m lengths. For shop-lined piping, the maximum length of PE lined pipe spool is kept at 18m because of transportation limitations. The minimum pipe spool length requirement is 5m (can be as less as 2m if agreed with the PE lining vendor). PE lining can be done only for straight pipe spools. It can not be done for pipe spools with reducers or branches. In such cases (for pipe spools with reducers or branches) roto-lining is carried out.

Bends for PE lining shall not be less than 20D radius (recommended radius is 40D wherever possible). PE or ROTO lining cannot be carried out for pipe spools with orifice flanges because of the small size of orifice flange tapings. In this case, one option is to use a suitable material for the upstream & downstream pipe spools & the orifice flanges. And the other option is to use carrier rings with orifice tapings & orifice plates of the suitable material which will get sandwiched between two PE-lined flanges and avoids the use of expensive material for the upstream & downstream pipe spools. 

Annulus Vents

Every PE-lined pipe spool shall have vent points. The minimum number of vent points shall be one on each flanged end of a section of lined pipe. The vent points are to be provided with valves for oil & gas applications & without valves for water service applications. The valves shall be opened only for venting purposes. Continuous venting is not permitted. The purpose of venting is as follows.

  • To vent the (ambient) gas from the pipe/annulus during installation.
  • To vent the permeated fluids accumulated in the annulus to prevent collapse.
  • To allow monitoring of the integrity of the PE liner during the service life.

Vent holes shall be designed such that no extrusion of the PE liner will occur. For larger diameter lines, vent discs with multiple holes or wire screens may be used. Vent holes shall not be larger than 3 mm in diameter. All vents shall be valved (except for water service where vents can be plugged) and shall have a “snorkel” to prevent ingress of dirt, moisture, and/or air.

The design of the vent point assembly shall be agreed upon with the Company.

Design Guidelines for ROTO Lined Piping

Rotolining is a method of lining the inside of pipes or other parts with a seamless, one-piece inner layer of plastic. In this lining technique, the lined spool is produced by heating and rotating a carbon steel spool with a polymer, which is in a granular form, placed inside the pipe spool. The polymer melts and forms a liner on the internal surface of the carbon steel pipe. Also, the polymer forms a bond with the metal.

The choice of which polymer to use is based on the chemical resistance properties that are required for the final part. Polyethylene, Polypropylene, PVDF, or a number of other polymers is used for roto-lining applications. The lining thickness varies from 2 mm to 8 mm. The heavy lining thickness allows the post-machining of critical surfaces that would not be possible with a thinner lining applied by other methods. Virtually any type of metal weldment or casting can be rotolined. Typical items that can be rotolined are tanks, carbon steel pipes, fittings, and complex welded structures.

Rotolining Procedure

The rotolining process comprises placing a polymer having an average particle size of 70-1000 μm containing a melt processible fluoropolymer, in a cylindrical article to be lined (the powder being present in a sufficient amount to make a lining at least 500 μm thick).

The cylindrical article is rotated to bring the radial acceleration at the substrate surface to be coated to 100 m/sec2 or greater, pressing the powder against the article to be lined by means of the centrifugal force generated by that rotation, at the same time heating the melt-processible fluoropolymer to a temperature equal to or higher than the melting point of the melt-processible fluoropolymer, but not higher than 400° C., thereby adhering the melt-processible fluoropolymer to the surface of the article to be lined.

During the heating cycle, the polymer particles begin to stick to the hot metal substrate. Skin is formed. This skin gradually forms a homogenous layer of uniform thickness. Ultimate wall thickness is determined by the amount of material that is initially placed into the cavity.

Adding a small amount of a heat stabilizer such as PPS (polyphenylene sulfide) to prevent the decomposition of the fluoropolymer on heating can give an excellent coating with minimal bubble formation.

After a predetermined time at a specific temperature, the entire polymer is distributed over the surface of the spool. The spool is then cooled by a combination of forced air and water mist.

The part is then removed from the machine and surfaces such as the flange face and “O” ring sealing areas are machined into the plastic. Linings are spark and ultrasonically tested to ensure liner integrity.

The process itself introduces no force or shear to the material. The result is a relatively stress-free lining. Rotolined parts are completely seamless and weld-free.

Advantages of ROTOLINING

  • Seamless construction with a very smooth interior surface.
  • Polymer rotolining has excellent chemical resistance, relatively high-temperature performance, and an excellent metal-to-plastic bond.
  • Thicker lining & uniform wall thickness can be achieved than electrostatic or spray coating.
  • Drastically reduces permeation through the coating and possible corrosion of the metal substrate.
  • The thicker coating can be repaired by welding if mechanically damaged. Thin coatings must be stripped and recoated if repairs are not possible.

ROTO lining dimensional limitations

Guidelines for ROTO lining dimensional limitations are as per below table:

Rotolining Limitations
Rotolining Limitations
Rotolining Dimensional table for Size up to 28 inches
Rotolining Dimensional Table for Sizes up to 28 inches
Rotolining Dimensional Table for Size 32 inches to 40 inches
Rotolining Dimensional Table for Size 32 inches to 40 inches

All dimensions given in the above table shall be considered diagonal lengths. The above dimensions shall be verified with the ROTO lining contractor prior to issuing the isometrics for fabrication.

For ROTO lining minimum branch-off size shall be 1” NB.

The thickness of PE & ROTO lining on the flange raised face (collar thickness) is as per the below Table:

Flange Collar thickness
Flange Collar thickness

The above thicknesses shall be verified with the PE & ROTO lining contractors prior to issuing piping isometric drawings for construction.

Flange joint details for PE / ROTO lining piping: 

Typical PE / ROTO lined flange joint detail is as follows:

Typical Flanged joint
Typical Flanged joint

The 1/2” NB annulus vents shown in the above sketch are for PE-lined pipe spool only.

Galvanized carbon steel retainer rings are used between PE / ROTO lined flange joints to hold the stub ends in place (to avoid the plastic material from deformation). The width of the retainer ring is calculated as follows:

A = (2 x B + 2 x T) – 3 mm

Where,

  • A – Width of the retainer ring
  • B – Thickness of flange raised face
  • T – Collar thickness

Retainer rings are generally provided by the PE lining vendor, still, it has to be confirmed with the vendor at the start of the project.

The following sketches provide information regarding the use of a retainer ring & insulating gasket for PE & ROTO lining flange joints.

Flanged joints
Flanged joints

The use of insulating gasket for PE & ROTO lining piping is restricted for the insulating spools only wherever shown in P&ID/PEFS. For a flange joint between PE / ROTO lined CS piping & SS or DSS mating flange insulating gasket is not required to be provided.

For insulating joint insulating gasket, extra long sleeves, washers & extra long bolts are required. The spectacle blind, spade & spacers shall be considered suitable material for PE & ROTO lined piping and the blind flange shall be epoxy coated or ROTO lined. This shall be finalized with the client & construction contractor prior to the start of a project.

A typical isometric of PE/Rotolined pipe is shown below:

Typical PE/Roto-lined isometric drawing
Typical PE/Roto-lined isometric drawing

Storage Tank Settlement for Piping Stress Analysis

In my last article on stress analysis of tank piping, I described the effect of tank bulging. Click here to refresh yourself on the effect of storage tank bulging. In this article, I will describe the effect of storage tank settlement on stress analysis of piping systems connected to large tanks.

Why does settlement occurs for tanks but not for other equipment?

Other equipment’s diameter is usually small (up to 3m). Therefore it is possible to design its foundation with large rafts (say 10 m) to minimize or have an insignificant settlement.

Whereas storage tank diameters are generally large, of the order of 10 m to 60 m. Due to this, it is impractical to design its foundation with a raft, which would be much bigger than this. Many times it has a ring foundation with soil compacted within this concrete ring.

How much settlement is to be considered?

The amount of settlement depends on the location of the tank. The amount of settlement is normally mentioned in the soil investigation reports or geo-technological investigation reports.

IN THE CASE OF SAND:

The majority of the total settlement occurs during the hydrostatic test of the tank (before the piping is connected). This is generally permanent.

… Typically 60%

The balance of 40% of the settlement, occurs after the piping is connected to the storage tank nozzle. And the piping system needs to be designed properly with this settlement effect.

IN THE CASE OF CLAY:

Progressive settlement.

The settlement is more at the center of the storage tank, and typically 50% at the edge of the tank.

Since our nozzles and tank roof are connected/supported on the shell, which is on the outer edge of the atmospheric storage tank, we need to consider the settlement at the outer edge of the tank.

Following Data to be obtained from civil for each tank (for each project)

  • Total long-term settlement.
  • The settlement value that will occur during the construction and hydro test of the tank.
  • Recovery (if any) following construction and hydro test of the tank.
  • The further settlement, after the hydro test of the tank, (at the edge of the tank).

Sample Data from civil for each tank for a typical project is shown in Fig. 1 for understanding.

  • It contains each Tank number.
  • Settlement at the Centre of the Tank.
  • Settlement at Edge of Tank.

Then out of the total settlement at Edge, 40% of the total settlement is what we consider in piping stress analysis.

Sample tank settlement data for piping stress analysis
Fig. 1: Sample tank settlement data for piping stress analysis

Pipe routing guidelines (Fig. 2) to minimize the effect of tank settlement:

To reduce the effect of tank settlement on piping:

  • First support shall be kept sufficiently away from the tank nozzle.
  • Large-diameter piping combined with large tank settlement may call for use of spring support.

However, the use of spring support shall be avoided because accidental draining of the line will cause an excessive upward force on the piping and tank nozzle.

So, if spring support is used

  • WNC (Weight with No Content) load case shall be mandatory for liquid lines. In fact, for all liquid lines with spring support, (whether it is connected to the tank or any other line), a WNC run shall be mandatory. In the case of the tank, all lines connected to the tank will be carrying liquid only.
  • The spring hanger setting should be adjusted in such a way, that the nozzle load is within the limit in the normal operating case, as well as in the WNC case.
  • That is set spring support for loads lower than what is required. This will increase the nozzle load in the normal operating case but will reduce the load in the WNC case.
Figure showing pipe routing guidelines to reduce effect of tank settlement.
Fig. 2: Figure showing pipe routing guidelines to reduce the effect of tank settlement.

Click here to learn about storage tank piping layout considerations.

Pipe Stress Analysis Report Preparation for Issuing to the Client

Proper documentation of the stress calculation performed using Caesar II or any other stress analysis software is very important as the report or documents are the final deliverables to the client. So one should incorporate each and every detail of the analysis, assumptions if any, the basis of design, etc. in the final report. Every organization must have its standard format of reporting but the same changes slightly from project to project depending on client requirements. In this article, I will try to highlight major points which must be included in the final report before sending it to the client for approval.

Pipe Stress Analysis Report Front Page

Each final report starts with a very nice front page. The front page normally includes the project name; project no, client name with logo, PMC name with logo, and the performing organization or EPC consultant name with logo. It should also include the name of the stress system and the system number for which the report is prepared.

Contents of Pipe Stress Analysis Report

On the 2nd page normally it is better to include a table with revision details, name of performer, checker, and approver along with signature and report issue date. It informs the client about the responsible persons who are performing the analysis.

The next sheet or page should include brief content of all the major points with page numbers that are included in the report. From this page, the client will be able to know whether all relevant points are incorporated and considered in the analysis or not.

From the next page onwards, the actual analysis report of each stress system starts. Broadly the report should include the following major points:

Project Background: The project background can be included in 3-4 sentences highlighting the major points of the project. Many organizations use this as the starting point for the introduction part of the report. However, I personally do not prefer to include it.

Document Scope and Purpose: Every document must start stating the objective/ scope and purpose of the document. In this part, you can include the major system description. A typical objective is included here for your reference: “The main objective of this document is to furnish the findings of stress analysis performed on SYS-001 (Line 42”-P-YYYY-YYYY line routed from Tie-in YYYY to Tank (T-YYYY) inlet nozzle.” In a similar way, you can describe the system for which you are preparing the report.

Next, you can include a list of all abbreviations that you are going to use in the report. If you are not using abbreviated terms then this part is not required.

Now you have to include the lines which are included in that specific stress system. After including the major system lines, you can include the reference lines with the suffix REF (Ex. 18”-P-1235-REF).

Next, you have to include the names and numbers of all reference documents which are used in the analysis. Reference documents mean you should include the P&ID number with revision, line list number with revision, PMS number with revision, Equipment TAG and GA drawing number with revision, Any datasheet (PSV, Control Valve, etc.) number with revision, etc.

Assumptions and Consideration: The next part of the report is very important. Here you should mention all the considerations and assumptions if any. In a few points, you should mention all major highlights which can impact the stress system. A typical example of assumptions is shown below:

  • The ambient temperature considered is 21° C.
  • All systems have been analyzed for maximum and minimum design temperature cases. The operating temperature from the line list is not used in the analysis.
  • Caesar II configuration file “mm. fil” is used in the analysis.
  • Rigid body weights (flanges, valves, strainers, etc. as applicable) are considered from Caesar II database / Pipe Data Pro.
  • Control valve and PSV weights (wherever applicable) have been assumed suitably based on judgment where vendor data is not available.
  • Based on the YYYYYY project, YYYY has considered the Post Hydro test tank settlement value is assumed as 25 mm. All piping flanges have to be connected with tank nozzle flanges only after the tank hydro testing activity is finished.
  • Seismic Analysis has been ignored in this stress analysis.
  • Wind Analysis has not been performed as most of the lines are below 10 m elevation.
  • The existing part of lines has been modeled taking a reference from the existing PDMS 3D model. We have provided sufficient flexibility for a new line for arresting maximum thermal displacements where we could not find any guides/line stop in the existing line for proper boundary condition.

Conclusions: In this section, you should write in brief the conclusions which you have reached after the analysis. A typical example is shown in the below-mentioned bullet points:

  • Pipe Stresses are within the allowable limits (Refer to the attached Stress Summary Report)
  • Support loads are within the acceptable limits (Refer to attached Restraint Summary Extended Report)
  • Thermal Displacements and Sustained Sagging is within the acceptable limit (Refer to attached Restraint Summary Extended and Sustained displacement Reports)
  • Equipment nozzle loads are qualified with Vendor Allowable Loads in GA drawing/ relevant API standard (for pumps) as applicable (Refer to Nozzle Loading Details Sheet attached)
  • Supports at nodes YYY, ZZZ, and PPP are lifting in design temperature conditions. However, a separate hot sustained/lift-off file has not been made as the system is qualifying under Appendix P operating code stress check of ASME B 31.3. (Refer to attached Stress Summary Report).
  • Refer to marked-up stress isometrics for any stress recommendation.
  • Refer attached spring datasheets and SPS drawings for reference.

Load Cases used in Analysis: In the next section you can mention the load cases that you have considered for analysis. However, as all load cases will appear in the stress summary or restraint summary you can skip this part here.

Detailed Report Appendices: Now you are required to include the following reports from Caesar II. It is better to use an appendix for the same for proper demarcation. A typical method is shown here.

  • Appendix A: Pipe Stress Analysis input echo from Caesar II
  • Appendix B: Stress Summary Report from Caesar II
  • Appendix C: Restraint Summary Extended report from Caesar II
  • Appendix D: Sustained Displacement Report from Caesar II
  • Appendix E: Nozzle load qualification report (Normally in excel sheet, However, NEMA/WRC Caesar II reports can be attached)
  • Appendix F: Trunnion calculation Report
  • Appendix F: Spring datasheets if any
  • Appendix G: SPS drawings if any

Attachments for Reference data: In the final part you should include the final marked-up stress isometrics and reference drawings in attachment form as shown below:

  • Attachment A: Marked-up stress isometrics.
  • Attachment B: P&ID drawing highlighting the system marked up
  • Attachment C: LDT/ Line List drawing highlighting the specific lines.
  • Attachment D: Equipment GA Drawings highlighting the nozzles and relevant data.
  • Attachment E: PMS
  • Attachment F: Caesar II plots for the overall system look.

Briefly, the above-mentioned points are sufficient for a complete report. However, if the client insists on any additional details you have to include the same along with the above-mentioned points. Hope now you will be able to prepare a complete report of the stress systems that you are performing.