Recent Posts

Difference Between PFD and P&ID: PFD vs P&ID

Process Flow Diagram or PFD and P&ID or Piping/Process & Instrumentation Diagram are chemical/process engineering drawings and are very important for Process, Piping, Mechanical, and Instrument Engineers and Designers of any Process Plant or Power Plants. These drawings are very useful as they convey the right amount of process information as needed during various stages of bidding, engineering design, procurement, construction, operating & commissioning phases of the process.

What is a Process Flow Diagram or PFD?

A Process Flow Diagram (PFD) shows the relationships between the major components in the system. Generally, a PFD (Fig. 1) shows only the major equipment and doesn’t show details. A PFD does not show minor components, piping systems, piping ratings, and designations. This diagram shows the flow of chemical fluids and the equipment involved in the process with the properties of flowing chemical fluids (like temperature, pressure, fluid density, flow rate, etc).

Process engineers are responsible for designing PFD based on the chemical process and thermodynamic properties of the fluid in question. Typically, process flow diagrams of a single unit process will include process piping, major equipment items, control valves, and other major valves, connections with other systems, major bypass and recirculation streams, operational data (temperature, pressure, mass flow rate, density, etc.)

Fig. 1: Sample PFD

Process flow diagrams generally do not include minor components like process control instrumentation, piping systems like control loops, by-pass lines, drain lines, pipe properties like size, specification, ratings, pipe classes, pipeline numbers, components such as isolation and shut-off valves, maintenance vents and drains, relief, and safety valves, vents and drain.

What is the Piping/Process & Instrumentation Diagram (P&ID)?

A Piping and Instrument Drawing (P&ID– Also known as PEFS, Process Engineering Flow Scheme in some engineering organizations) includes more details than a PFD. It includes both major and minor details of the chemical process. P&ID (Fig. 2) shows all major equipment, piping details like service, size, spec, rating, insulation, etc, instrumentation details like pressure, temperature, and flow instruments, control valves, pressure safety valves, meters, pipe routing information such as slope, tapping, free flow.

Instrumentation and their details are shown using standard symbols which vary from company to company.

All kinds of valves used like On-off valves, motorized valves, relief valves, and miscellaneous items like strainers, vents, drains, silencers, standpipes, etc. are shown in the P&ID.

Fig. 2: Sample P&ID

Vendor items and packages are shown with their limits and interfaces. A lot of information such as equipment design pressure, temperature, and material of construction, free-draining requirements is provided as notes in the P&ID.

Line numbers, Tag numbers, and Equipment Numbers shown in the P&ID are usually retained in the further documents and drawings created.

P&ID includes:

  • Mechanical equipment with names and numbers
  • Pipeline number, size, material, insulation
  • Every instrument and its pneumatic/ electric signal
  • Detailed control loops
  • Utility lines, drain and vent lines, sampling lines, etc.
  • Parallel and spare equipment and connected piping
  • Isolation and shut-off valves.
  • Miscellaneous – vents, drains, special fittings, sampling lines, reducers.

A P&ID does not include:

  • Equipment rating or capacity
  • Instrument root valves
  • Manual switches and indicating lights
  • Primary instrument tubing and valves
  • Elbows and similar standard fittings
  • Extensive explanatory notes

In both, PFD and P&ID arrows indicate the flow of materials. Normally P&IDs are a more detailed scheme of simple PFDs.

About The Author: This article is written by Mr. Khaja Najmuddin, a Piping Stress Engineer with extensive experience in the Oil and Gas sector. For more details about the author click here to refer to his LinkedIn profile.

Pipe Support Friction Coefficient and Frictional Loads on Pipe Supports

Pipe Support friction plays a significant role in pipe stress analysis. All piping stress engineers must be aware that while modeling supports or restraints we have to enter the frictional coefficients at the pipe support surfaces. The value of this coefficient depends on the supporting surface material and surface roughness. During the project bidding stage (ITB Document) the client generally provides the information regarding which friction factor to be used for which surface.

Also, every EPC organization prepares its own guideline for using standard friction factors in case not available in the ITB document. The following write-up will try to provide an idea regarding which coefficient of friction to be used in what situation. This can be used as a guide only. However, project-specific data or information will override any word mentioned here.  

What is Friction Coefficient?

The coefficient of friction provides a measure of the amount of friction existing between two sliding surfaces. The coefficient of friction is defined as the ratio of the Normal force to the resisting force. As the friction coefficient is a ratio of two forces, it is a unit less or non-dimensional.

Coefficient of Friction for Various Surfaces

The coefficient of friction factor depending upon the supporting interface (i.e, the junction between the Top of the Steel and the Bottom of the Pipe or Bottom of the Shoe/Cradle) shall be applied at all vertical restraints (+Y or Y supports) locations as mentioned below. But if ITB for any project provides separate data then those data shall be considered.

  • Carbon Steel to Carbon Steel: 0.3
  • Polished Stainless Steel to Polished Stainless Steel/Graphite: 0.15
  • Teflon to Teflon/ Polished Stainless Steel: 0.10
  • Concrete to Carbon Steel: 0.5
  • Pipe to Roll Support: 0.01 to 0.05
  • Teflon to Carbon Steel: 0.2
  • Pipe on Sand Soil (pipe laying on the sand): µ=0.4

There is various philosophy among EPC companies regarding the use of coefficient of friction for guide and directional anchor supports. Some organizations prefer not to use any frictional co-efficient for horizontal support. However if used the same can be taken from the above table (normally 0.3 is used if no special arrangement is made).

Using Support Friction in Caesar II

Refer to Fig. 1 to understand the Support Friction Co-efficient application philosophy in the Caesar II input screen.

Support Friction in Caesar II
Fig. 1: Support Friction in Caesar II

Friction coefficient must be applied for all vertical sliding restraints or Rest types of supports. However, there is variation in the philosophy of friction coefficient application for guide and line stop supports. Some organization uses friction co-efficient for guide and limit stops while some organizations do not use it.

Again there are differences in support friction considerations for occasional stress calculations. Some organizations make friction multiplier in caesar ii load cases as zero. They believe that occasional events like seismic, wind, slug, etc being dynamic events the application is quick and friction does not get time to act in those instances. Where some organization keeps the friction multiplier value as 1. So, follow what your organization is following during the aboveground pipe stress analysis.

Significance of Support Friction

As you can see in Fig. 1, In CAESAR II, the friction is activated at any restraint by entering a non-zero Mu value. Generally, no friction factor is used while supporting using rigid hangers.

In general, friction will always be present whenever a pipe will move. The frictional force will act against the pipe movement. The maximum frictional force against the pipe sliding will be Mu (Coefficient of friction) times the vertical restraint force. If a pipe movement is in the +X direction the frictional force will act in the -X direction. Friction creates a non-linear effect on the piping system.

As friction opposes pipe displacement, it will create high stress on the pipe and higher loads on the connecting equipment.

Many a time in Caesar you may find that due to the non-linear effects, the iteration in Caesar II analysis does not converge. In that situation deleting the friction from that specific support node can converge the solution and the result is obtained.

Reducing Pipe Support Friction Forces

To optimize structural design, qualify expansion stresses, and qualify nozzle loads, it may be required to reduce frictional loads. As we know,

Frictional force=Coefficient of Friction (Mu) * Vertical Normal Force at the support location.

As vertical force is usually constant, the friction force can easily be reduced by changing the friction coefficient.

This is the reason that pipe stress engineers sometimes used SS/PTFE/Graphite plates at the contact surfaces to reduce friction coefficient which in turn reduces the horizontal frictional force. Special support design arrangements are made to use PTFE/Graphite/SS plates.

However, some organizations argue that with the passing of time, the reduced friction coefficient does not remain valid and the friction coefficient increases. Also, there may be the inclusion of sand particles in between the contact surfaces where a frequent sand storm is expected. So, many organizations do not prefer to use PTFE/Graphite slide plates to reduce frictional loads.

Sometimes, pipe roller supports or Spring Hanger Supports are used in place of normal resting supports to reduce support friction.

Some Important Consideration related to Pipe Support Friction Coefficient

In case when Sliding Plate is required, add the comment “(PTFE/Graphite) Sliding Plate Required” and mention friction factor μ=0.1 /0.15 respectively depending on temperature” on the stress sketch. Use Teflon (PTFE) Slide plate up to a temperature of 204 degrees Centigrade, above which use a graphite plate (up to 540 degrees Centigrade).

Normally the friction factor shall not be applied when modeling bottom type spring. But sometimes ITB document/Client could insist on friction modeling of bottom type springs, in that situation friction factor could be applied as per requirement.

When the pipe/shoe is supported on the welded rod on the structure, a friction factor of 0.25 shall be considered.

For buried or underground pipes frictional forces are very high.

For Compressor and Turbine piping systems, some organization wants to qualify the equipment nozzle loads in both cases, using friction and without friction.

For Zigzag pipelines, it’s preferable to check pipeline displacements without support friction and decide on the sleeper or support dimensions. There are many instances of pipe movement at the support location to be more than the pipeline design displacements considering support friction. So, by designing support dimensions without considering the friction effect solves the problem.

Further Studies on Support Friction in Pipe Stress Analysis

To learn more about pipe support friction and its implication the following paper by L C Peng is highly beneficial: Treatment of Support Friction in Pipe Stress Analysis by L C Peng

Online Course on Pipe Support Engineering

If you want to learn more details about pipe support engineering then the following online course is a must for you:

Common Non-Ferrous Piping Materials used in Process Industry

I had already published an article that relates to the most common ferrous materials used in the piping industry. Click here to visit the page. In this article, I will mention the most frequently used non-ferrous piping materials.  

Pipes made of Plastic materials | Plastic Piping

In comparison with metallic materials, the use of plastics is limited to relatively moderate temperatures and pressures [230 deg C (450 deg F) is considered high for plastics]. Plastics are also less resistant to mechanical abuse and have high expansion rates, low strengths (thermoplastics), and only fair resistance to solvents. However, they are lightweight, are good thermal and electrical insulators, are easy to fabricate and install and have low friction factors. Since plastics do not corrode in the electrochemical sense, they offer another advantage over metals. The important thermoplastics used commercially are polyethylene, polyvinyl chloride (PVC), fluorocarbons (Teflon, Halar, Kel-F, Kynar), and polypropylene. Important thermosetting plastics are general-purpose polyester glass-reinforced, bisphenol-based polyester glass, epoxy glass, vinyl ester glass, furan, and phenolic glass, and asbestos reinforced. While using non-metallic piping, viz HDPE, PVC, FRP, etc, the designer shall take care of the service, pressure & temperature. The manufacturer’s recommendation shall be taken into account.  

Thermoplastic Pipes

The most chemical-resistant plastic commercially available today is tetrafluoroethylene or TFE (Teflon). This thermoplastic is practically unaffected by all alkalies and acids except fluorine and chlorine gas at elevated temperatures and molten metals. It retains its properties up to 260 deg C (500 deg F). Perfluoroalkoxy, or PFA (Teflon), has the general properties and chemical resistance of FEP at a temperature approaching 300 deg C (600 deg F). Polyethylene is the lowest-cost plastic commercially available. Mechanical properties are generally poor, particularly above 50 deg C (120 deg F), and the pipe must be fully supported. Carbon-filled grades are resistant to sunlight and weathering. Polypropylene has a chemical resistance about the same as that of polyethylene, but it can be used at 120 deg C (250 deg F).  

Thermosetting plastic Pipes

Among the thermosetting materials are phenolic plastics filled with asbestos, carbon or graphite, glass, and silica. Relatively low cost, good mechanical properties, and chemical resistance (except against strong alkalies) make phenolics popular for chemical equipment. Furan plastics filled with asbestos and glass have much better alkali resistance than phenolic resins. Polyester resins reinforced with fiberglass, have good strength and good chemical resistance except to alkalies. Epoxies reinforced with fiberglass have very high strengths and resistance to heat. The chemical resistance of the epoxy resin is excellent in non-oxidizing and weak acids but not good against strong acids. Alkaline resistance is excellent in weak solutions.  

Pipes produced from Rubber and elastomers

Rubber and elastomers are widely used as lining materials. The ability to bond natural rubber to itself and to steel makes it ideal for lining tanks. Natural rubber is resistant to dilute mineral acids, alkalies, and salts, but oxidizing media, oils, and most organic solvents will attack it. Hard rubber is made by adding 25 percent or more sulfur to natural or synthetic rubber and, as such, is both hard and strong. Chloroprene or neoprene rubber is resistant to attack by ozone, sunlight, oils, gasoline, and aromatic or hydrogenated solvents, but is easily permeated by water, thus limiting its use as a tank lining. Nitrile rubber is known for its resistance to oils and solvents. Butyl rubber’s resistance to diluting mineral acids and alkalies is exceptional. Hypalon has outstanding resistance to ozone and oxidizing agents except fuming nitric and sulphuric acids. Fluoroelastomers (Viton-A, Kel-F, Kalrez) combine excellent chemical and temperature resistance.  

Medium Alloys

A group of (mostly) proprietary alloys with somewhat better corrosion resistance than stainless steel are called medium alloys. A popular member of this group is 20alloy. Made by a number of companies under various trade names. Durimet 20, and Carpenter 20 are a few names. This alloy was originally developed to fill the need for a material with sulphuric resistance superior to stainless steel. Other members of this group are Incoloy 825 and Hastelloy G-3. These alloys have extensive applications in sulphuric acid systems. Because of their increased nickel and moly contents, they are more tolerant of chloride-ion contamination than standard stainless steel. The nickel content decreases the risk of stress-corrosion cracking and molybdenum improves resistance to crevice corrosion and pitting.  

High alloys

The group of materials called high alloys all contain a relatively large percentage of Nickel. Hastelloy B2  contains 61% Nickel & 28% Mo. The alloy has unusually very high resistance to all concentrations of HCL at all temperatures in the absence of oxidizing agents. Other materials of this group are Chlorimet 2 & Hastelloy C-276.  

Nickel & Nickel alloy Pipes

The metal is widely used for handling alkalies, particularly in handling and storing caustic soda. Neutral alkaline solutions, seawater, and mild atmospheric conditions do not affect nickel. A large number of nickel-based alloys are commercially available. One of the best known out of these is Monel 400 with 67% Ni and 30 % Copper. This Ni-Cu alloy is ductile and tough. Its corrosion resistance is better than its components, being more resistant than a nickel in reducing environments and more resistant than copper in oxidizing environments.  

Pipes from Copper and copper alloys

Copper and its alloys are widely used in chemical processing, particularly when heat and thermal conductivity is very important. The main copper alloys are brasses(Cu-Zn), Bronzes( Cu- Sn), and Cupronickels. Some of the bronzes are very popular in the process industry, like Aluminium and silicon bronzes because they combine good strength with corrosion resistance. Cupronickels have 10-30% nickel and have become very popular because it has the highest corrosion resistance of all copper alloys. This finds its application in heat-exchanger tubing and its resistance to seawater especially outstanding.  

Titanium Pipes

Titanium has become increasingly important as a construction material. It is strong and of medium weight. Corrosion resistance is very superior in oxidizing and mild reducing media. Titanium is usually not bothered by impingement attacks, crevice corrosion, and pitting attacks in seawater. Its general resistance to seawater is excellent.   A detailed list of commonly used non-ferrous materials in hydrocarbon industries is given in the following table.  

Common Non-ferrous Pipe Materials
Common Non-ferrous Pipe Materials

Static Method of Wind Analysis of Piping systems in Caesar II using Pressure Vs elevation Method

Wind analysis is performed based on the Client/ITB requirement. Wind load is an occasional load that normally occurs less than 20% of plant operating time. There are two methods for wind analysis-Static and Dynamic. In this article, I will explain the static method of wind analysis using Caesar II of Hexagon PPM (COADE Inc) following the Pressure Vs Elevation Profile.

Criteria for the selection of lines for Wind Analysis:

Criteria should be mentioned in the ITB document. As a guideline, the following can be followed after verification from the client:

  • Lines with outside diameter 10” and larger (including insulation) running on 10 m and above.
  • Steam / Flare header on the pipe rack.
  • Other lines are considered important as per the stress engineer’s decision.

However, if lines are covered by some shelter or other structures then wind analysis can be ignored for those lines.

Data Required for Wind Analysis

For wind analysis, you must have the following data from the client.

  • Wind shape factor: Normally for pipe elements, the data varies from 0.6-0.8. Check in the ITB document what value it says to use.
  • Pressure Vs Elevation Profile: Sometimes the client provides this profile directly and sometimes provides equations and data to calculate the profile. A typical wind profile will be shown in the diagram while explaining the steps required while analyzing using Caesar II.
  • Elevation of the line under analysis. If HPP (Highest Pavement Point) elevation is other than 0 you have to reduce HPP from line global elevation to get the actual elevation.

What to check in the Analysis

As per code B 31.3, we have to check code compliance of the calculated occasional stress (Sustained +Wind). The allowable stress for wind analysis is 1.33 times the Sh values. However, sometimes the client requires checking the nozzle loading in Operating+ Wind cases (W+T+P+Win) for static equipment. Normally the client does not require wind load checking for rotating equipment.

Steps for Static Analysis in Caesar II

Most of the steps are mentioned in the attached images. All are self-explanatory. However, if you face any problem in understanding please reply in the comments section.

  • Model the piping system under analysis from piping isometric drawings.
  • Enter the elevation of the first node in global coordinates.
  • Click on the Wind/Wave checkbox on Caesar II Spreadsheet and mention the wind shape factor as shown in Fig. 1
Caesar Spreadsheet for Wind Analysis
Fig.1: Caesar Spreadsheet for Wind Analysis
  • Now run the analysis and go to the load case editor and select Pressure Vs Elevation as shown in Fig. 2
Load Case Editor showing Wind Pressure Vs Elevation
Fig. 2: Load Case Editor showing Wind Pressure Vs Elevation
  • In the next step enter the pressure vs elevation profile in-consistent unit and enter wind direction cosines as shown in Fig. 3. Normally wind analysis is performed considering wind flow from North, South, East, and West direction. Accordingly, Enter +1 or -1 in X or Z direction. Wind analysis is generally not considered in a vertical direction.
Load Case Editor showing input of pressure vs elevation profile
Fig. 3: Load Case Editor showing input of pressure vs elevation profile
  •  Refer to Fig. 4 and prepare the highlighted load cases additionally for wind analysis. Load cases for L17 to L20 are for code compliance checking and load cases from L5 to L8 are for support and Nozzle load checking.
loadcases for wind analysis
Fig. 4: Load cases for Wind Analysis
  • Refer to Fig 5 and make the combination method scalar or absolute for the shown load cases.
Load case Editor showing load case combination method.
Fig. 5: Load case Editor showing load case combination method.
  • In the final stage run the analysis and check the results. If failing makes suitable adjustments to qualify the same.

Few more resources for you…

Static Seismic Analysis in Caesar II
Stress Analysis Basics
Stress Analysis using Caesar II
Stress Analysis using Start-Prof
Piping Design and Layout Basics
Piping Materials Basics

Overview of Offshore Pipeline Systems

Offshore pipelines are the center stage of the subsea transportation system. Any offshore oil and gas projects constitute a long length of offshore pipelines. These are also known as sub-sea pipelines. In the transportation and delivery of carbon products, offshore pipelines play a major role. But the design and laying of offshore pipelines are not easy. It requires many considerations. In this article, we will explore the basics of offshore pipeline projects in brief.

Why offshore pipelines?

Pipelines are used for transportation and delivery services from historic times due to their own advantages like

  • Safer
  • Environment friendly
  • Least energy requirement
  • Lowest maintenance costs
  • Minimal impact on land use pattern
  • Negligible loss of product in transit
  • High reliability

What can be transported through Offshore Pipelines?

Offshore pipelines can be used to transport liquids, solids, and gases as per requirement. Normally the following products are used inside offshore pipelines:

Flow Sequence of Offshore Pipelines

Fig. 1 below shows the sequence of flow for offshore pipeline operations.

Sequence of Flow
Fig. 1: Sequence of Flow

Offshore Pipeline and Riser System

The schematic of an offshore pipeline and riser system is shown in Fig. 2 below:

Schematic of offshore pipeline and riser system
Fig. 2: Schematic of the offshore pipeline and riser system

Stages of an Offshore Pipeline Project

Codes & Standards used in Offshore pipeline projects:

Various codes and standards establish the design guidelines for offshore pipeline systems. The major ones are listed below for reference:

  • DNV OS-F101: Det Norske Veritas, Rules for Submarine Pipeline Systems
  • ASME B31.8: Gas Transmission and Distribution Piping Systems
  • ASME B31.4: Liquid Transportation Systems for Hydrocarbons, LPG and Anhydrous Ammonia, and Alcohols
  • API 1104: Standard for Welding Pipelines and Related Facilities
  • API 1110: Pressure Testing of Liquid Petroleum Pipelines
  • NACE MR0175: Material Requirements – Sulphide Stress Cracking Resistant Materials for Oil Field Equipment
  • IP 6: Institute of Petroleum –Pipeline Safety Code

Offshore pipeline Project Stages

All offshore pipeline projects have the following stages before it is ready to take the first fluid.

  • Conceptual Study
  • Feasibility Study
  • Basic Engineering
  • Detailed Engineering
  • Construction
  • Testing & Commissioning

Conceptual Study

In this stage for offshore pipelines, the following major activities are performed.

  • Establish System Requirement
  • Evaluate Constraints on System Design
  • Identify Interface With Other Systems
  • Develop Design Data Requirements
  • Assess Construction Methodology
  • Finalize the Concept

Feasibility Study

The feasibility study is a very important stage for offshore pipeline projects as it evaluates all possible options for the project to decide the feasibility. The major activities of this stage are

  • Evaluate Technical Options
  • Eliminate Un-viable Options
  • Firming up of Process Facilities
  • Develop Broad System Specifications
  • Establish Project Cost
  • Plan Project Implementation Scheme
  • Finalize Process Scheme & Equipment

Basic Engineering

Basic Engineering is the next important stage for offshore pipeline projects. The major activities involved in this stage are listed below:

  • Environmental & Process Data Review
  • Pipeline Routing & Size Optimization
  • Establish Requirements for
  • Surveys and Investigations
  • Material of Construction
  • Preliminary Analysis
  • Construction, Testing, and Commissioning
  • Develop Implementation Schedule

Safety Aspects for offshore pipeline projects

  • Environmental Parameter and Soil Data
  • Pipeline Stability
  • Shore Approaches
  • Trenching and Burial
  • Safety of Existing Facilities

Detailed Design & Engineering

The main or the most important stage of any offshore pipeline project phase is detailed engineering. Most of the design works are studied in detail and completed in this stage.

  • Engineering Design Basis
  • Route Engineering & Surveys
  • Engineering analysis and Calculations
  • Specification and Job Standards
  • Engineering for Procurement
  • Drawings for Construction
  • Installation analysis and Procedures
Design Basis

The engineering design basis provides all the governing criteria to follow in the pipeline project. It provides the

  • Basic Data
  • Design Codes and Standards
  • Design Philosophy
  • Operation and maintenance philosophy
  • Environmental Criteria
    • Installation
    • Operation
  • Criteria for engineering analysis
Route Selection

Pipe route selection for offshore pipelines is very important and it is an exhaustive activity. It includes the following considerations:

  • Routing Considerations
  • Pipeline length
  • Sensitive areas
  • Obstructions
  • Installation Limitations
  • Crossings
  • Drilling Rig Movement / Access
  • Surveys
  • Geo-physical & Geotechnical Surveys
  • Platform Approach / Riser Face Survey

Offshore Pipeline Wall Thickness Selection

The wall thickness of offshore pipelines is calculated and selected considering all possible failure stages. It includes

  • Analysis / Calculations
  • Hoop Stress
  • Buckle Initiation
  • Buckle Propagation
  • Collapse Bucking
  • Local Buckling
  • Pipeline Stress Checks
  • Equivalent Stress
  • Analysis Tools
  • PC Based Software ‘Pipecalc’

Wall Thickness Calculation

For Offshore Pipelines     t = (PD/2.SMYS.a) + corrosion allowance    where

  • P is the internal design pressure in psig.
  • S is the specified minimum yield strength
  • D is the pipe’s outside diameter in inches.
  • t is the nominal wall thickness in inches.
  • a is the design factor (0.72 for pipeline and 0.5 for riser)

Allowable Stress Limits for Offshore Pipeline Systems

Fig. 3 below provides the allowable stress limits for offshore pipeline and riser systems.

Allowable Stress limits
Fig. 3: Allowable Stress limits

Types of Line pipes in Offshore systems

A variety of pipeline sizes is used in offshore pipeline projects. Normally following line pipes are used:

  • Seamless up to 16″
  • LSAW 18” and above

Engineering Analysis

Various engineering analyses need to be done in the complete design life cycle of offshore pipelines including the following

  • Stability Pipeline (Lateral & Vertical)
  • Pipeline Expansion
  • Pipeline Spans
  • Riser
  • Analysis Tools
  • PC Based Software ‘Pipecalc’

Anti Corrosion Coatings

  • Coating Anti-Types
  • Coal Tar Enamel
  • Fusion Bonded Epoxy

Selection Criteria

  • Service Conditions
  • Performance Record
  • Ease of Repair
  • Cost-Effectiveness
  • Compatibility with Concrete Coating

Design for Offshore Pipeline Crossing

Stress Analysis of Offshore pipelines

Stress analysis (Both static and dynamic) must be performed for all offshore pipeline systems to ensure code and engineering compliance with

  • Permissible Spans
  • Stability of Supports
  • Deflections
  • Stresses, etc

Design Tools for Offshore Pipelines

Fig. 4 below lists a few of the design tools that are used for the design of offshore pipeline and riser systems.

Design tools for pipeline analysis
Fig. 4: Design tools for pipeline analysis

Online Video Courses related to Pipeline Engineering

If you wish to explore more about pipeline engineering, you can opt for the following video courses

Few more Pipeline related useful Resources for You..

Underground Piping Stress Analysis Procedure using Caesar II
Comparison between Piping and Pipeline Engineering
A Presentation on Pipelines – Material Selection in Oil & Gas Industry
Corrosion Protection for Offshore Pipelines
Start up and Commissioning of the Pipeline: An Article
DESIGN OF CATHODIC PROTECTION FOR DUPLEX STAINLESS STEEL (DSS) PIPELINE
AN ARTICLE ON MICRO TUNNELING FOR PIPELINE INSTALLATION
A short presentation on: OFFSHORE PIPELINE SYSTEMS: Part 1
Factors Affecting Line Sizing of Piping or Pipeline Systems

Equipment Nozzle Loads and Means for Reducing Them

Nozzle loads are the forces and moments that the piping system exerts on the equipment nozzles. One of the important qualification requirements while stress analysis of a piping system is to keep these loads and moments within a given allowable limit which is known as Nozzle load allowable values. Nozzle loads are basically sets of three forces and three moments with respect to three axes. These loads and moments are generated in the nozzle connection due to various factors like Pipe Weight, Design Pressure, Thermal movement, Occasional effects, etc.

One of the major difficulties piping stress engineers face while analyzing any piping system is to keep piping side loads or external loads (forces and moments are combinedly mentioned as loads) on equipment nozzle connection within allowable limits. All equipment to which the piping system is connected is categorized into two groups.

Nozzle Loads for Static Equipment 

Most of the prevailing EPC organizations follow a project-specific table as allowable values for static equipment (made of steel, ferrous material) like pressure vessels (Columns, Horizontal vessels, Drums, Reactors, Filters, Scrubbers, and sometimes Tanks which are not within API 650 scope, etc) and shell and tube heat exchangers or similar equipment.

Static Equipment Nozzle
Fig. 1: Static Equipment Nozzles

The allowable nozzle load table is generated based on the following two-parameter:

In some organizations, the table value is multiplied with some factors (normally 0.75) while checking nozzle loads for shell and tube heat exchangers.  

Equipment Nozzle Loading

Normally the mechanical department includes this load table in the equipment purchase requisition and sends it to the equipment vendor while bidding. It is clearly indicated that the nozzle connections must be designed to resist the table values. The equipment vendor reproduces the values in the equipment general arrangement drawing to avoid any confusion at a later stage.  

For cases, where the static equipment does not fall into the types mentioned in the above criteria the nozzle loads have to be obtained from the equipment vendor or from some ASME B31.3 code specified standards. A few of such type of equipment and nozzle connection is listed below for your reference:

Jacketed nozzles connected to Normal pressure vessels:

Loads are to be obtained from the manufacturer, in case the piping side load is more than allowable loads have to be forwarded to the vendor for FEA/vendor acceptance.

Jacketed nozzles connected to Jacketed pressure vessels:

Loads are to be obtained from the manufacturer, in case the piping side load is more than allowable loads have to be forwarded to the vendor for FEA/vendor acceptance.

Pressure vessels made of nonferrous (Aluminium is more common) materials:

Loads are to be obtained from the equipment vendor.

Nozzles connected to Air Fin Fan Cooler:

Loads are mentioned in API 661, discuss with the vendor (check internal project specification) if any factor is to be used (Normally a factor of 2 or 3 is used in some organizations).

Nozzles connected to Plate Fin Heat Exchanger:

Refer to API 662 for nozzle loads (There are 2 tables in the standard depending on fluid service (normal service and severe service), check carefully which table to be used)

Tangential nozzles connected to Pressure Vessels:

Loads have to be taken from the manufacturer.

Nozzles whose axis is not perpendicular to the Vessel axis:

Obtain allowable loads from the vendor.

Nozzles connected to API Tanks with diameters more than 36 meters:

Refer to API 650 for nozzle loads (No standard table is provided for load values, you have to determine the loads from equations.)

Fig. 2: Tank Nozzles

Nozzles connected to Fired Heaters:

Refer to API 560 for allowable nozzle loads. Sometimes a factor of 2 or 3 is used for multiplying the table values. Refer to project specifications for the same or discuss it with the vendor.

Nozzles connected to Miscellaneous Equipment (Cold Box, Flaker system, Packaged items, Spherical Equipment, Cooling Tower, etc): Arrange limiting loads from Vendor.

Nozzle Loads for Rotary Equipment

Normally rotary equipment is designed based on some code-specified standards and accordingly, the limiting loads have to be taken from respective standards. Some such commonly used equipment are mentioned below:  

Nozzle Loads for Centrifugal Pumps

For pumps that are designed based on API standards, allowable loads have to be taken from API 610 (If loads are more than allowable values as specified in table 5 of the standard, perform Appendix P). Allowable load values up to nozzle size 16 inch is provided in the table. For higher sizes, the ANSI standard is used. If the pumps are not designed as per API standards (nowadays non API pumps are most frequently used due to its lower costs) obtain loads from the vendor. Sometimes ANSI/HI 9.6.2 is used for nozzle loads in absence of data.

Fig. 3: Pump Nozzle

Positive displacement (Screw pumps, gear pumps, etc) pumps:

Use API 676 for allowable nozzle loads. Loads can be taken from the vendor.

Reciprocating Pumps/Compressors:

Obtain the allowable nozzle loads from the vendor.

Centrifugal Compressors:

Use API 617 for equipment nozzle loads. Note that combined analysis must be performed for the proper functioning of the compressor. Sometimes the vendor permits more loads so discuss with them.

Steam Turbine:

Refer to NEMA SM23 or API 612 for allowable nozzle loads. Don’t forget to perform combined nozzle load checking. Sometimes the vendor permits more loads so discuss with them.

Positive displacement compressors:

Refer to API 619 or manufacturer allowable loads.

Gas Turbine: Loads are to be obtained from the manufacturer.

Means for Reducing Nozzle Loads 

Now if the nozzle load on equipment is found to be more than the allowable values as specified above, first try to get a feel of the reason for the increased load and then try to apply any of the following alternatives to reduce the nozzle loads:  

  • Try to reduce the nozzle load by adding additional flexibility in the piping system (Could be followed if the load is arising because of less flexibility)
  • If the load is due to the weight of the piping system, provide additional support.
  • Try to direct the thermal expansion away from the equipment by providing proper restraints (guide or directional anchors).
  • If the load is more because of friction then try to use PTFE/graphite/Mirror polished SS plates to reduce frictional loads.
  • In extreme situations expansion joint or cold spring (normally not preferred) can be applied.
  • Sometimes hot modulus of elasticity can be used to calculate equipment nozzle loads.

Even after all trial and error if it is not possible to reduce the loads within allowable limits then forward the actual load values (increased by at least 20% if all piping data is not final) to the vendor for FEA analysis and their acceptance. Click here to know 10 important points related to pressure vessel nozzle load tables.